Privacy and Data Security

RSS Feed Email Print
Share
View divider Overview divider Attorneys divider a-pvcblog.gif divider PDF Version
Practice Contacts
Liisa Thomas
T: +1 (312) 558-6149 | Email
Practice Areas
Advertising, Marketing & Privacy Law Practice
Advertising and Entertainment Disputes
Advertising & Promotions Counseling
Advertising & Promotions Transactions
Sweepstakes and Promotions
Privacy and Data Security
Technology Transactions, Licensing, and Outsourcing
Copyright Litigation
Trademark Litigation
Resource Center
Topics
advertising   BCR   behavioral tracking   blogging   breach notification   CAN-SPAM   CARU   children's privacy   cloud computing   collection of consumer information   communications privacy   consumer privacy   cookies   COPPA   data breach   data breach notification   data protection   data security   data sharing   data transfer   decision of adequacy   eavesdropping   ECPA   electronic communications   email   employee privacy   EU   FACT   financial privacy   FTC   health care   identity theft   international   invasion of privacy   membership programs   mobile   NLRB   online and consumer privacy   online behavior advertising   privacy training   retail privacy   robocalls   SCA   security   Shine the Light   social media   spyware   TCPA   telemarketing   telephone marketing   text messages   tracking and monitoring   transborder data flow   TSR   wiretap   workplace privacy  
Other Winston & Strawn Blogs
PRIVACY LAW CORNER
Welcome to Winston & Strawn's Privacy Law Corner, a blog where we cover recent developments in privacy and data security laws. We strive to give you not just updates, but an analysis of what lessons you can learn from these new cases, and practical tips to implement those lessons for your company. Our blog is edited by Winston & Strawn partner Liisa Thomas, and features authors from across the firm. To learn more about any of the cases or issues covered, please don't hesitate to contact one of us or your regular Winston & Strawn contact. To subscribe to these updates, please see the RSS icon at the top right of the page. You can also follow us on Twitter at @WinstonPrivacy.
About the Bloggers
Blog Tools Recent Postings | All Postings | Power Search | Attorney Login
May 9, 2012
MySpace Settles FTC Charges of Sharing Information with Advertisers

The MySpace privacy policy indicates, according to the FTC, that a users’ personally identifiable information will not be shared for purposes inconsistent with the reasons why it was submitted. MySpace is also a participant in the EU-US Safe Harbor program, under which it self-certified that it would tell users how information was used and give users the ability to opt-out. The FTC recently charged that MySpace, in violation of its public promises (in the self-certification and the privacy policy), shared “Friend IDs” with advertisers. Friend IDs are persistent unique identifiers assigned to each user on MySpace. The Friend ID number is viewable by others, as it is associated with the URL of a MySpace user’s profile page. Advertisers could thus use the Friend IDs to find users on MySpace, and depending on the privacy settings the user had set, could see all the information in the user’s profile (and in some cases, could see what those users were doing elsewhere on the Internet). As part of a settlement reached on May 8, 2012, MySpace has agreed to implement a comprehensive privacy program which includes: having an employee or group of employees responsible for the program; identifying foreseeable risks and placing controls to manage those risks; regularly monitoring compliance and effectiveness of the program; and making sure vendors can properly protect privacy. MySpace has also agreed to get third-party assessments done every other year for the next 20 years, and for the next five years report to the FTC if it receives any consumer privacy complaints, among other things.

TIP: The FTC has reported that this is part of its “ongoing efforts to make sure companies live up to the privacy promises they make to consumers.” Companies should examine closely their privacy policies –and other public statements made about how information will be treated- to ensure that they are accurate. This case also reminds companies to look at the activities of third party partners as well as the companies own.



Liisa M. Thomas
Email comments to the author