Illinois Court Rules Taxpayer Is a Nonresident Despite Continuing Business Ties With the State

Taxpayers continue to secure victories in residency cases involving the Illinois individual income tax. In the past year, taxpayers have won two favorable Appellate Court cases wherein the court ruled that the taxpayers had successfully terminated their state residency for purposes of Illinois income tax. Most recently, the Cook County Circuit Court held that a taxpayer had successfully terminated his Illinois income tax residence, despite the taxpayer’s significant ongoing business ties with the State. Edmund Sweeney v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue, No. 2010 L 050524 (Cook Cty. Cir. Ct., June 26, 2013).

Under Illinois law, the entire income of an Illinois resident (which is defined to include an individual domiciled in the State) is taxable by Illinois. By contrast, a nonresident is taxable only on income that is sourced to the State.

In this case, the taxpayer, Edmund Sweeney, had been the Managing Director and part owner of Stafford Trading, a Chicago based corporation, which was sold to TD Options, LLC, in 2002. Sweeney assumed the position as Managing Director of TD Options, which had offices in Chicago, London, New York, Philadelphia and San Francisco. TD Options incurred losses during the tax years at issue – 2002 through 2004 – and Mr. Sweeney, after moving to Florida in late 2001, was required to spend increasing amounts of time in the company’s Chicago office. The Court held that despite Mr. Sweeney’s continuing ties with Illinois, the majority of his ties began to shift to Florida in 2002, including establishment of a residence in Florida, social club memberships in Florida, and Florida business interests which generated the vast majority of the income he earned. Based on these facts, the Court ruled that Mr. Sweeney was no longer domiciled in, and therefore no longer a resident of, Illinois for individual income tax purposes.


Please contact one of the Winston & Strawn SALT attorneys listed below if you have questions about how this case may affect your situation.

Chicago
(312) 558-5600
San Francisco
(415) 591-1000
Robert F. Denvir Charles J. Moll III
Alan V. Lindquist Troy M. Van Dongen
Jocelyn M. Wang

Follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/winstonlaw
Text WINSTON to 21534 to get a message from Winston & Strawn about the firm. Includes link that functions only if your phone has internet access. Msg&data rates apply. Text STOP to 21534 to stop or email us. Text HELP to 21534 for help. Terms and Conditions.


Attorney advertising materials.

These materials have been prepared by Winston & Strawn LLP for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. These materials do not constitute legal advice and cannot be relied upon by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties imposed under the Internal Revenue Code. Receipt of this information does not create an attorney-client relationship. No reproduction or redistribution without written permission of Winston & Strawn LLP.

Along with this briefing, a library of all the Winston & Strawn LLP briefings published to date can be accessed by visiting the Publications Library section of Winston & Strawn LLP's Web site www.winston.com.

© 2013 Winston & Strawn LLP