Blog
New CD&Is Clarify the SEC COVID-19 Relief Order’s Effect on Form 12b-25 Notification of Late Filings
Blog
April 2, 2020
On March 31, 2020, the SEC released two new compliance and disclosure interpretations (CD&Is) clarifying how the SEC’s COVID-19 order, issued March 4, 2020 (the COVID-19 Order), which granted conditional relief to companies affected by coronavirus, interfaces with the standard Form 12b-25 notice for late filings.
The CD&Is explain that if a registrant affected by coronavirus is unable to file a report covered by Form 12b-25 on a timely basis, without incurring an unreasonable effort or expense, the registrant should instead file a Form 8-K or Form 6-K to comply with the COVID-19 Order. The COVID-19 Order requires that registrants furnish certain statements by the later of March 16 or the original due date of the report in question. If a registrant only files a Form 12b-25, it will not have met the conditions of the COVID-19 Order to provide additional statements on a Form 8-K or Form 6-K and will not be granted the 45-day relief period.
The CD&Is also clarify that a registrant will not be able to use the relief granted by the COVID-19 Order if it only filed a Form 12b-25 and subsequently tries to rely on the order to extend the filing deadline. Unless a registrant had filed a Form 8-K or Form 6-K complying with the COVID-19 Order’s requirements by March 16 or the original due date for the filing, it will not be able to rely on the COVID-19 Order. However, a registrant that relies on the COVID-19 Order will be considered to have a due date 45 days after the original filing deadline for that report, and it would be subsequently permitted to rely on Rule 12b-25 if it is unable to file by the extended due date.
For more details regarding the COVID-19 Order, see our prior blog post here.
View all of our COVID-19 perspectives here. Contact a member of our COVID-19 Legal Task Force here.
Related Professionals
Related Professionals
This entry has been created for information and planning purposes. It is not intended to be, nor should it be substituted for, legal advice, which turns on specific facts.