Loot Box Update: Western District of Washington Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Valve Corporation

In another blow to plaintiffs suing game developers and publishers over loot boxes, a district court in the Western District of Washington granted summary judgment in favor of Valve Corporation. The case concerns the use of loot boxes in Valve’s Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Defense of the Ancients 2, and Team Fortress 2 games. Plaintiffs claimed that these games violate the Washington Consumer Protection Act because their loot boxes constitute online gambling, which Valve failed to disclose. Plaintiffs attempted to certify a class of parents of children who purchased loot boxes in the games after an arbitration determined that the children themselves had no such claim.

The plaintiff’s parents’ claims stumbled on the element of causation. Although they alleged that Valve failed to disclose gambling elements in Defense of the Ancients 2 and Team Fortress 2, plaintiffs admitted that their children never purchased any loot boxes in those games, and for that reason, the Court dismissed the claims. As for Counter-Strike, the claims depended on a showing that plaintiffs relied on Valve’s affirmative misrepresentations or omissions about the loot boxes in Counter-Strike. But the plaintiff’s parents failed to present any evidence that they ever visited a Valve or Steam website, ever played Counter-Strike, or ever read or heard anything about loot boxes in that game. Thus, even if the plaintiff’s parents were correct that Valve should have made a more fulsome disclosure about loot boxes, the plaintiff’s parents would not have seen those statements, and thus their children’s purchase decisions would not have been different. Because plaintiffs could not establish causation, the court dismissed their claims.

Sign up to receive emails with links to new posts by clicking here.