The Supreme Court just opened the doors to civil RICO suits against defendants alleged to have caused personal injury. This ruling could have major implications for product manufacturers and sellers, which may now face RICO claims—and treble damages—alongside traditional state-law claims in product-liability cases.

On March 31, 2025, the Trump administration initiated a “comprehensive review of federal contracts and grants at Harvard University and its affiliates” by the Joint Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism (Task Force) to ensure that Harvard is “in compliance with federal regulations, including its civil rights responsibilities.” Later that same day, Alan Garber, Harvard’s President, emailed a statement to the Harvard community expressing an intent to engage with the Task Force.

On April 18, the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in Recentive Analytics, Inc. v. Fox Corp., invalidating under Section 101 of the Patent Act and the two-step Alice test patents using machine learning models. The Federal Circuit acknowledged that “[m]achine learning is a burgeoning and increasingly important field and may lead to patent-eligible improvements in technology.” Nevertheless, the Federal Circuit held that “patents that do no more than claim the application of generic machine learning to new data environments, without disclosing improvements to the machine learning models to be applied, are patent ineligible under § 101.” Although some district courts had previously found claims on machine learning methods patent-ineligible, the Federal Circuit recognized that this case presented “a question of first impression” under its precedent.