Jonathan D. Brightbill
Partner
Chair, Environmental Litigation and Enforcement Practice
An experienced trial and appellate lawyer, Jon was the nation’s lead environmental law enforcement official as Acting Assistant Attorney General at the United States Department of Justice. He is uniquely positioned to represent clients in government enforcement and investigations, regulatory challenges and counseling, and complex civil litigation including “greenwashing” class actions, citizen suits, and CERCLA allocation. Jon is a national leader on legal issues relating to climate change, environmental disclosure, and “green” advertising.
Key Matters
Some of the experience represented below may have been handled at a previous firm.
Litigation
- Representing a major national trade association in a case challenging a regulatory ruling by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, currently on appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals after winning before the district court
- Successfully represented an LNG export company in petition for review challenging a regulatory action by the U.S. Department of Energy, including oral argument before the D.C. Circuit
- Represented a large retailer in a putative class action regarding sustainability advertising, obtaining dismissal of major claims
- Represented a national cruise line operator in a petition for review challenging a regulatory action by the U.S. Department of Transportation, including oral argument before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals
- Led the criminal and civil environmental enforcement of the United States at the U.S. Department of Justice, including review and approval of complaints, indictments, plea agreements, and civil settlements and consent decrees
- Trial and appellate counsel for clients across the federal district and appellate courts and the U.S. Supreme Court on cases covering all major environmental, natural resource, and energy statutes, including the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, CERCLA (land remediation), RCRA (waste), TSCA (toxic chemicals), FIFRA (pesticides), FDCA (food safety), Endangered Species Act, Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, Natural Gas Act (FERC, DOE), Federal Power Act (FERC), Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Marine Mammal Protection and Dolphin Protection Consumer Information Acts, NEPA, Occupational Health and Safety Act, Lacey Act, and others
- Leads client response to criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement and congressional investigations, as well as internal investigations
- Defends clients in “greenwashing,” sustainability, and other ESG and consumer deception class-action and public interest lawsuits, successfully defeating numerous class actions on motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, and denial of class certification, or by inducing case abandonment
- Trial counsel for clients in property-taking, eminent domain, and related litigation, including the Helms–Burton Act
- Trial and appellate counsel in maritime and related regulatory litigation, including Jones Act disputes related to the U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Customs and Border Patrol and Coast Guard agencies
- Trial counsel for clients in Endangered Species Act and public nuisance litigation
- Argues cutting-edge administrative, environmental, energy, and other legal issues in the appellate and district courts, including Affordable Clean Energy Rule and Clean Power Plan (D.C. Cir.), Navigable Waters Protection Rule and Clean Water Rule (10th Cir., district courts), FIFRA pesticide tolerances (9th Cir., en banc), FIFRA state law preemption (9th Cir.), Section 303 Water Quality Standards (9th Cir.), CAA preemption of climate tort claims (9th Cir.), CAA RMP amendments (D.C. Cir.), and Endangered Species Act enforcement (E.D. Okla.)
- Trial counsel in complex, multiparty CERCLA cases concerning hundreds of millions of dollars in cost allocation, and cases raising novel statutory and other interpretive issues that reached the U.S. Supreme Court
- Led petitions for review and appellate practices at the ENRD, setting case strategy, coauthoring briefing, and mooting and overseeing arguments for scores of cases to all of the nation’s federal appellate courts, as well as merits, certiorari, and other briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court
- Achieved many civil litigation successes, including a jury verdict and multimillion dollar recovery in a five-week false advertising and unfair competition trial; approval of a US$21.7B contested restructuring after a two-month bankruptcy trial; a US$45M jury verdict in a patent infringement case; summary judgment in an international antitrust class action MDL for putative price fixing; a preliminary injunction after an evidentiary hearing on false advertising claims in the telecommunications sector; and a preliminary injunction leading to the repeal of unlawful environmental regulations
- Represented major commercial clients in the telecommunications, health care and nutrition, pharmaceutical, consumer products and retail, financial services, Internet, crypto, and automotive industries
- Defended dozens of large, high-stakes, complex class actions and MDL cases, including cases regarding PFAS chemical substances
- Litigated advertising, consumer fraud, and unfair trade and deception cases before district courts, the National Advertising Division (NAD), and National Advertising Review Board (NARB)
- Counseled clients in white collar and government investigations—including those relating to the FCPA, FCA, antitrust, and unfair competition—and before the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general
- Litigated on behalf of debtors and creditors in multibillion dollar bankruptcy and restructuring litigation and adversary proceedings, including disputes relating to commercial lending and corporate governance
- Represented the U.S. in litigation pursuing preemption of California, Maryland, Washington, and other state laws relating to pollution nuisance under the Clean Air Act, including oral argument before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Represented major automakers in preemption litigation against the State of California, State of Vermont, and other states regarding the preemption of carbon dioxide emission regulations
- Represented major automakers in preemption litigation against the State of California regarding the preemption of their Zero Emission Vehicle mandate